Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Proposes changing federal marijuana penalties to allow sentences of one to three years instead of longer terms.
The problem
Current federal marijuana laws impose lengthy prison sentences. Some argue these sentences are too harsh and don't match modern public opinion on marijuana use.
The proposal
The bill would modify federal sentencing rules for marijuana offenses to establish one-to-three year prison terms as a standard instead of longer mandatory minimums.
The impact
Federal prisoners convicted of marijuana crimes, the justice system, and communities affected by drug enforcement policies would face changes in sentencing and incarceration lengths.
Shorter sentences could reduce the number of people in federal prisons, lowering costs and easing crowded facilities. This frees resources for other criminal cases.
Most Americans now support marijuana legalization or reduced penalties. This bill reflects changing views about marijuana compared to decades past.
Shorter prison stays mean lower costs for federal prisons. Tax dollars could be spent on other priorities like education or infrastructure.
Federal mandatory minimums have affected certain communities more heavily. More flexible sentencing could reduce unfair outcomes in the justice system.
Police and federal agents may argue that reduced sentences weaken deterrents against drug crimes. They might worry about enforcement effectiveness.
The bill only changes federal sentencing, not state laws. Most marijuana prosecutions happen at the state level, so impact would be limited.
The bill reduces sentences but doesn't legalize marijuana federally. This creates confusion since marijuana remains illegal under federal law.
Some argue that reduced penalties could encourage larger-scale marijuana operations and trafficking networks that cause community harm.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10777
National Coordination Center and Commercial Cyber Capabilities Codification Act
HR 10762
Anthony Amoros Law Right to Know Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
No lobbying disclosures matched this bill.