Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a right-to-know law named after Anthony Amoros.
The problem
Insufficient public access to certain government information or corporate data, potentially affecting transparency and accountability.
The proposal
Establishes disclosure requirements and public access rights, though specific provisions unclear without full bill text.
The impact
Citizens, businesses, and government agencies may face new transparency requirements and information disclosure obligations.
Citizens gain better access to information affecting their lives. This can improve government and corporate accountability. Public trust may strengthen when decisions are visible.
People can make informed choices about products and services. Access to data helps identify safety issues earlier. Businesses must disclose practices consumers care about.
Citizens and watchdog groups can monitor government actions better. Media can investigate issues more thoroughly. Wrongdoing becomes harder to hide.
Voters need information to make decisions. Informed citizens participate more effectively in democracy. Transparency supports civic engagement.
Businesses must spend money gathering and publishing information. Small companies face bigger burdens than large ones. Government agencies need new staff and systems.
Mandatory disclosure might expose personal or sensitive data. Trade secrets could become public. Individuals may face unwanted attention or harassment.
Too much public data confuses rather than helps citizens. People struggle to understand complex disclosures. Intentional confusion can actually reduce accountability.
Forced disclosure of business strategies harms competitiveness. Competitors gain valuable information. American companies may lose advantages to foreign rivals.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.