Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Provides funding and programs teaching violence prevention skills to youth.
The problem
Youth violence remains a persistent public health issue. Communities lack adequate resources for evidence-based prevention programs and skill-building initiatives.
The proposal
Establishes grants and funding for schools and organizations to teach conflict resolution, de-escalation, and violence prevention skills to young people.
The impact
Students, schools, youth organizations, and communities would gain access to violence prevention training. Potential reduction in youth violence incidents and improved school safety.
Addresses violence root causes through education rather than solely enforcement. Teaching conflict resolution skills gives youth better tools for managing disagreements peacefully.
Directs resources to youth programs and schools in need. Can strengthen community-school partnerships and create local employment opportunities.
Early intervention may reduce violence rates and crime costs over time. Creates safer schools and neighborhoods for residents.
Teaches students practical life skills applicable beyond violence prevention. Improves emotional intelligence and interpersonal communication abilities.
Requires government funding allocation during competing budget priorities. May increase federal debt or require cuts elsewhere.
Training program effectiveness varies by school and community capacity. Requires sustained commitment and proper program oversight.
Violence prevention programs show mixed results in different contexts. Difficult to measure direct causation between training and violence reduction.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
S 5482
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.