Latest action: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Homeland Security, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes federal policies to fight international cybercrime and related crimes.
The problem
Criminal groups operate across countries using the internet to commit fraud, theft, and other illegal activities. Current policies may not adequately address these transnational cyber crimes.
The proposal
The bill codifies (puts into law) specific government policies and procedures for combating cybercrime that crosses national borders and related criminal activities.
The impact
Federal law enforcement, international partners, and cybersecurity agencies gain clearer legal authority. Individuals and businesses facing cyber attacks may see improved protection and response.
Codifying cyber crime policies helps law enforcement agencies in different countries work together more effectively. This makes it harder for criminals to hide across borders.
Putting policies into law removes confusion about which agencies can act and how. This speeds up investigations and prosecutions of cyber criminals.
Companies face fewer cyber attacks when enforcement is coordinated and consistent. A stronger legal framework can deter criminals from targeting American businesses.
Everyday people who use the internet benefit from reduced fraud, identity theft, and hacking. Stronger anti-cybercrime laws protect consumers and their personal information.
Stronger law enforcement powers may require accessing more personal data and online activity. Without careful safeguards, this could threaten privacy rights for ordinary citizens.
Federal agencies will need funding, training, and resources to enforce new cyber policies. Taxpayers may face higher costs for this expansion of government activity.
Different countries have different laws and views on cybercrime and surveillance. Codifying policies could create conflicts with other nations' legal systems.
Without seeing the actual bill text, it's unclear how specific or detailed these policies are. Vague laws could be interpreted different ways by different agencies.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.