Latest action: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 36 - 0.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Creates a task force to develop and coordinate strategies for preventing scams.
The problem
Americans lose billions annually to scams. Scammers target vulnerable populations. Coordinated prevention efforts are fragmented across agencies.
The proposal
Establishes a Strategic Task Force on Scam Prevention to develop comprehensive anti-scam strategies, coordinate federal agency efforts, and recommend policy changes.
The impact
Consumers, federal agencies, and law enforcement gain coordinated scam prevention framework. Vulnerable populations may receive better protection guidance.
A coordinated task force can identify scam patterns faster and issue warnings more effectively. Better prevention education saves Americans money. Vulnerable seniors and low-income families benefit most from improved protections.
Currently different agencies handle scams separately. This task force brings them together to share information and best practices. Eliminates gaps where scammers operate between agencies.
Agencies gain better data on scam trends and perpetrators. Resources are deployed more efficiently. Prosecution rates may improve through coordinated investigations.
Task force can develop unified prevention messages for all Americans. Clear, consistent education helps people recognize and avoid scams more effectively.
Task force requires staffing, funding, and administrative costs. Resources may not be available for other priorities. Unclear if benefits justify the spending.
A task force typically studies and recommends actions but cannot force change. Recommendations might sit idle without agency cooperation. Real prevention relies on agencies actually implementing proposals.
Task forces often move slowly while scammers adapt quickly. By the time recommendations are made, scammers have already changed tactics. Speed matters in fraud prevention.
Coordinating across agencies means sharing personal consumer data. Increased information sharing creates privacy risks. Potential for misuse or data breaches increases.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.