Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 741.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Protects American small businesses from foreign economic threats and unfair competition.
The problem
Foreign companies and governments may use unfair trade practices, subsidies, or other methods to harm American small businesses and take market share.
The proposal
The bill creates new tools to identify foreign threats to Main Street businesses and strengthens enforcement against unfair trade practices harming American companies.
The impact
Small business owners, workers, and communities gain protections. Foreign competitors face stricter rules. Consumers may pay more if trade barriers increase.
Small businesses get help defending against unfair foreign competition. They may survive and grow without being undercut by subsidized foreign companies. This keeps Main Street competitive.
New enforcement tools target countries that cheat on trade rules. This creates fairer market conditions. American workers and businesses compete on a level playing field.
Protecting domestic businesses helps keep American jobs from moving overseas. Workers in threatened industries gain more job security. Communities relying on these businesses stay stronger.
Reducing dependence on foreign suppliers for critical goods strengthens America. Keeping manufacturing domestic protects supply chains from disruption. This supports both economic and military security.
Trade barriers and restrictions may make imported goods more expensive. Consumers and businesses buying foreign products could pay more. Inflation might increase in some sectors.
Foreign countries may respond with their own trade restrictions. American exporters could face tariffs on goods they sell abroad. This could hurt farmers, manufacturers, and workers in export industries.
The bill's exact rules and definitions are unclear from the title alone. Businesses may not know what qualifies as a foreign threat. Implementation could be inconsistent or overly broad.
Limiting foreign competitors might reduce choices and innovation. Without outside competition, American businesses may have less incentive to improve. Consumers could lose access to cheaper or better products.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.