Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill would limit patent lawsuits used unfairly against competitors.
The problem
Patent holders may file lawsuits to harm business rivals rather than protect genuine inventions. These adversarial patents can block competition and innovation without real merit.
The proposal
Creates rules to stop patent owners from using lawsuits as weapons. Would require stronger evidence patents are being violated before cases proceed.
The impact
Tech companies, inventors, and consumers affected. Could reduce harmful lawsuits but might also make it harder for small inventors to protect real patents.
Stops bad-faith patent cases that drain company resources without valid claims. Companies spend less money on legal battles and more on innovation.
Removes barriers that prevent new companies from entering markets. More startups can compete without fear of questionable patent attacks.
More competition leads to better products and lower prices. Blocking anti-competitive lawsuits helps the market work fairly.
Courts focus on legitimate patent disputes instead of strategic lawsuits. System becomes more efficient and predictable.
Small inventors and startups may struggle to defend patents against large companies. Harder eligibility rules might discourage legitimate patent holders from filing.
Bill title suggests focus but lacks detail on what counts as 'adversarial.' Vague rules could create confusion and inconsistent court decisions.
If patents are harder to protect, inventors have less motivation to develop new technology. Could slow research and development investments.
Big corporations with legal teams can navigate new rules better than small businesses. May unfairly advantage large tech companies over individual inventors.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.