Latest action: Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Authorizes a feasibility study for manufacturing critical infrastructure domestically.
The problem
The U.S. relies on foreign sources for some critical infrastructure components, creating potential supply chain vulnerabilities and national security concerns.
The proposal
Directs the government to study the feasibility and costs of manufacturing critical infrastructure equipment and materials within the United States.
The impact
Manufacturers, government agencies, and consumers could be affected through new domestic production opportunities, policy changes, and potential costs.
Reducing dependence on foreign manufacturers for critical infrastructure makes the country less vulnerable to supply disruptions or geopolitical pressure. This feasibility study is a first step toward building domestic capacity for essential goods.
Manufacturing critical infrastructure domestically could create manufacturing and related jobs across multiple states. This supports local economies and workforce development in industrial sectors.
A feasibility study provides data-driven information for lawmakers to make better decisions about infrastructure investment. This helps ensure policies are based on realistic cost and implementation analysis rather than assumptions.
Domestic production capacity reduces reliance on global supply chains that can be disrupted by natural disasters, conflicts, or trade disputes. This improves resilience of critical systems.
Domestic manufacturing may be more expensive than foreign alternatives, potentially raising costs for infrastructure projects and taxpayers. These higher costs might delay critical infrastructure improvements or strain government budgets.
Shifting toward domestic manufacturing could trigger retaliatory trade actions from other countries or violate trade agreements. This could harm U.S. businesses that export products to other nations.
A feasibility study delays concrete action, and infrastructure challenges may worsen while policymakers wait for results. This approach does not immediately address supply chain concerns.
Building new domestic manufacturing capacity requires significant upfront investment with uncertain long-term returns. If demand is lower than expected, taxpayers could lose money on this investment.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.