Latest action: The Chair directed the Clerk to notify the Senate of the action of the House.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Lauren Boebert (R-CO)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Completes funding and construction of the Arkansas Valley Conduit water project in Colorado.
The problem
The Arkansas Valley Conduit project in Colorado has faced incomplete construction and funding gaps, leaving water infrastructure unfinished for years.
The proposal
The bill authorizes federal funding and directs completion of the Arkansas Valley Conduit water delivery system to serve Colorado communities.
The impact
Colorado water users, farmers, and municipalities gain improved water access. Federal taxpayers fund the project. Local communities benefit from completed infrastructure.
Finishes a long-delayed project that provides water to Colorado communities. Delivers reliable water supply to agricultural and municipal users who have waited years for completion.
Farmers and rural communities gain dependable water resources for irrigation and livestock. Strengthens regional agricultural economy and rural water security.
Ends uncertainty about whether a partially-built project will be completed. Allows communities to plan based on confirmed water availability.
Federal government shares construction costs with local partners. Represents federal responsibility for multi-state water resource development.
Requires significant federal funds to complete construction. Adds to federal budget obligations during other spending priorities.
Project primarily benefits Colorado. Other states and regions receive no direct benefit from this targeted spending.
Completing a long-delayed project may encourage other incomplete federal projects to seek similar completion funding.
Bill summary does not detail environmental impact assessment or water ecosystem effects. Large water infrastructure can affect river systems.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7250
To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.
HR 10602
Ottawa County Environmental Infrastructure Act
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 2753
Urban Canal Modernization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.