Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 640.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Senate Majority Leader schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
S 2753 modernizes urban canal infrastructure and water management systems.
The problem
Urban canals face aging infrastructure, flooding risks, and water quality issues affecting cities and surrounding communities.
The proposal
The bill authorizes updates to canal systems, water management improvements, and infrastructure modernization projects in urban areas.
The impact
Cities, water utilities, residents, and businesses benefit from improved drainage, flood prevention, and water quality. Taxpayers fund the projects.
Modern canal systems handle heavy rainfall better, protecting homes and businesses from flood damage. This reduces emergency costs and saves lives.
Updated systems can filter and manage urban runoff better. Cleaner water helps fish, plants, and communities that rely on these water sources.
Construction and maintenance of modernized canals provides work for engineers, laborers, and contractors in local communities.
Better infrastructure makes cities more attractive for businesses and residents. Improved water management reduces long-term damage costs.
Modernizing canal systems requires significant federal spending. Taxpayers bear the cost, and funds could go to other priorities.
No official summary provided means it is unclear exactly which canals get funding, how much money is involved, or what projects qualify.
Construction work can disrupt neighborhoods, businesses, and traffic during modernization. Some communities may face temporary inconvenience.
New systems require ongoing maintenance and repairs. Cities may struggle to fund long-term upkeep after federal projects end.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7250
To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.
HR 10602
Ottawa County Environmental Infrastructure Act
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 3792
Water Project Navigators Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.