Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 654.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Senate Majority Leader schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Creates navigators to help communities access federal water project funding and resources.
The problem
Communities struggle to navigate complex federal water programs and funding opportunities. Rural and disadvantaged areas lack resources to apply for federal water assistance.
The proposal
Establishes Water Project Navigators program to provide free guidance to communities on federal water funding, applications, and project development. Navigators help communities understand and access existing water programs.
The impact
Rural communities, tribal nations, and disadvantaged areas gain easier access to federal water funding. Local water authorities benefit from expert help with complex applications.
Communities that lack expertise can now get free help accessing federal water money. This could bring more investment to areas that need water infrastructure improvements. Rural and smaller communities benefit most from having expert guidance.
Navigator assistance could speed up water project development in underserved areas. Communities get help planning and executing water system upgrades. More water projects may get completed faster with expert support.
Poor and rural communities currently struggle with federal applications compared to wealthy areas. Navigators level the playing field for accessing resources. This helps address existing gaps in water infrastructure investment.
Local officials spend less time figuring out complicated federal requirements. Communities can focus resources on actual water problems instead of paperwork. Navigators handle technical guidance and application support.
Creating a navigator program requires federal funding and ongoing staff costs. Taxpayers fund another federal program. Budget impacts depend on how many navigators are hired.
No evidence shows whether navigators actually increase funding success rates. Results depend on navigator quality and community engagement. Program could be ineffective or wasteful.
Federal government already has water program staff and regional offices. New navigators might duplicate existing resources. Could waste money instead of improving efficiency.
If the program receives insufficient funding, only some communities get help. Could create new unfairness if some areas get navigators and others don't. Effectiveness varies based on budget allocation.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7250
To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.
HR 10602
Ottawa County Environmental Infrastructure Act
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 2753
Urban Canal Modernization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.