Latest action: Signed by President.
Signed into law by the President (or passed over a veto). Now public law.
The President signed the bill into law (or Congress overrode a veto). It's now public law and federal agencies will implement it.
Renews a water system program serving the Fort Peck Indian Reservation in Montana.
The problem
The Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000 needs reauthorization to continue providing clean water infrastructure to residents of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation.
The proposal
This bill reauthorizes the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act, allowing continued federal funding and support for water system development and maintenance on the reservation.
The impact
Fort Peck Reservation residents and the Assiniboine and Sioux tribes benefit from continued water infrastructure access. Local communities depend on this system for drinking water and agricultural use.
Reauthorization ensures the Fort Peck tribes can continue providing clean drinking water to reservation residents. This supports public health by maintaining water quality standards and infrastructure.
A reliable water system enables agricultural and business activities on the reservation. This supports jobs and economic opportunities for tribal members.
The federal government has trust obligations to Native American tribes. Reauthorizing this program honors treaty commitments to provide essential services.
Continued authorization allows repairs and upgrades to aging water systems. This prevents service disruptions and maintains water quality standards.
Reauthorization requires continued federal budget allocation for water system operations and maintenance. This represents an ongoing fiscal commitment without a defined end date.
No official bill summary is available, making it difficult for the public to understand specific changes or new provisions included in the reauthorization.
The reauthorization process involves congressional approval, which can delay funding and project timelines if approvals are slow or contingent on other legislative priorities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10602
Ottawa County Environmental Infrastructure Act
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 2753
Urban Canal Modernization Act
S 4040
Dakota Water Resources Act Amendments of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.