Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to fund environmental infrastructure projects in Ottawa County.
The problem
Ottawa County may need upgrades to water systems and environmental facilities to protect public health and water quality.
The proposal
Provides federal funding and support for environmental infrastructure improvements in Ottawa County, including water treatment and related projects.
The impact
Ottawa County residents, local governments, and water systems would receive federal funding to improve environmental infrastructure.
Improved infrastructure can lead to cleaner drinking water and safer environmental conditions. This protects public health and supports communities.
Federal money reduces the burden on local taxpayers to fund expensive infrastructure projects. Communities can address needs without raising local taxes.
Construction and infrastructure projects create jobs for local workers and contractors. This boosts the local economy and employment.
Better environmental infrastructure helps protect local waterways and ecosystems. This supports long-term environmental sustainability.
New federal spending adds to the national budget and debt. Taxpayers nationwide fund projects that benefit one county.
Funding goes only to Ottawa County while other communities with similar needs receive nothing. This raises fairness questions.
Without an official bill summary, the specific projects and spending amounts are unknown. This makes it hard to evaluate true costs and benefits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7250
To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 2753
Urban Canal Modernization Act
S 4040
Dakota Water Resources Act Amendments of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.