Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 661.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Reauthorizes the federal program that forecasts snow water supply for western states.
The problem
Western water managers need reliable snow forecasts to plan water supplies. The current forecasting program authorization is expiring and needs renewal.
The proposal
Extends the Snow Water Supply Forecasting Program, allowing continued federal funding and operations for predicting seasonal water availability from snowpack.
The impact
Water utilities, farmers, and communities in western states benefit from improved water planning and drought preparedness through updated snow forecasts.
Accurate snow forecasts help water managers plan supplies for cities, farms, and hydroelectric plants. This prevents both water shortages and wasteful over-allocation.
Early forecasts allow states to prepare for dry years before droughts hit hard. Communities can implement conservation measures and backup plans.
Farmers rely on snow forecasts to plan irrigation and crops. Better forecasts reduce farming losses and improve economic stability in rural areas.
Reauthorizing an existing program is cheaper than building new water infrastructure. Forecasting helps maximize existing water resources efficiently.
The program requires ongoing federal budget allocation. Some argue states should fund their own water forecasting instead of relying on federal money.
The program focuses only on snow-based water supplies. It does not address other water challenges like groundwater depletion or aging water systems.
Snow forecasts have accuracy limits, especially for extreme weather events. Plans based on forecasts can still fail during unexpected conditions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7250
To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.
HR 10602
Ottawa County Environmental Infrastructure Act
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 2753
Urban Canal Modernization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.