Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to stop automated bots from buying up holiday gifts and reselling them at higher prices.
The problem
During holiday shopping seasons, automated software programs buy large quantities of popular items instantly, preventing regular customers from purchasing them and forcing higher resale prices.
The proposal
The bill would regulate or restrict the use of automated bot software in retail transactions, particularly during peak shopping periods.
The impact
Holiday shoppers, retailers, resellers, and e-commerce platforms would be affected by new rules limiting automated bulk purchasing.
Regular customers would have a fairer chance to buy popular gifts at normal prices. This could reduce frustration during peak shopping seasons when items sell out instantly.
Local and smaller online stores could compete better against large resellers using bot technology. More inventory would stay available for regular customers.
Stopping bulk bot purchases could prevent artificial price markups in the resale market. Consumers would pay more reasonable prices for popular items.
Limits scarcity created artificially by bot activity. Makes shopping fairer and more predictable for average buyers.
Bot technology changes constantly, making it hard for law enforcement to keep up. Sellers could find new ways around restrictions.
Not all bulk buying is unfair; some resellers provide valuable services. The law could accidentally punish legitimate business models.
Retailers would need new systems to detect and block bots. This added expense might be passed on to customers through higher prices.
Without an official summary, it's unclear exactly how the bill defines bots or what penalties apply. This makes it hard to predict real effects.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.