Latest action: Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 44 - 0.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Increases financial penalties for companies breaking U.S. export control laws.
The problem
Current penalties under export control law may not adequately deter companies from illegally exporting sensitive technologies or materials that threaten national security.
The proposal
The bill amends the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to raise the maximum civil penalties companies can face for violating export control rules.
The impact
Exporting companies face higher financial risks for violations. U.S. government gains stronger enforcement tool. National security interests potentially better protected.
Higher penalties create greater financial risk for companies considering illegal exports, potentially discouraging violations before they happen. This may reduce unauthorized transfers of sensitive technology.
Increased penalties give federal agencies more leverage when negotiating settlements and more meaningful consequences to impose on violators. Enforcement becomes more effective.
Stricter penalties help prevent sensitive military, technology, and scientific information from reaching foreign adversaries or hostile actors. Protects strategic U.S. advantages.
Companies may need to invest more in export compliance programs to avoid higher penalties. Small exporters could face disproportionate burden compared to large corporations.
Companies may reduce legitimate export activities due to fear of penalties. This could hurt U.S. businesses engaged in lawful international commerce.
The bill summary does not specify how much penalties increase. Without knowing exact amounts, it's hard to assess whether changes are reasonable or excessive.
Higher stakes may make export regulations more complicated for companies to navigate. Small and mid-size businesses could struggle to maintain compliance.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10175
Banning Antiquated Duties and Delivering Equitable American Levies (BAD DEAL) Act of 2026
S 5381
ADVERSARIES Act
S 2677
A bill to expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.
S 5380
A bill to provide for a ten-year statute of limitations for export control violations under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.