Latest action: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR S4551)
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The Senate voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the House, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Bill allows countries to share information about suspected intellectual property theft in international trade.
The problem
Countries lack coordinated ways to report and share information about intellectual property violations across borders, making enforcement difficult.
The proposal
The bill creates mechanisms for nations to exchange information about suspected intellectual property rights violations during trade activities.
The impact
Businesses, governments, and international trade agencies gain better information sharing tools to combat counterfeiting and IP theft globally.
Sharing information helps countries catch counterfeiters and IP violators more effectively. This protects businesses that invest in innovation and trademarks.
More coordinated efforts can stop fake goods from entering markets. This protects consumers from poor-quality knockoffs and keeps legitimate businesses competitive.
When IP rights are better protected, companies feel safer investing in new products and ideas. This can lead to more jobs and economic growth.
Better coordination between countries makes trade fairer and more predictable. This helps businesses trust international commerce rules.
Sharing detailed trade information between governments could expose sensitive business data or trade secrets. Companies may worry their information gets misused.
Big corporations with strong IP portfolios benefit most from enforcement. Small businesses may face higher compliance costs without equal protection gains.
The bill doesn't detail what information gets shared or how countries use it. Different nations may have different privacy standards.
Countries with weaker resources might struggle to meet new information-sharing requirements. This could create unfair trade disadvantages.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10175
Banning Antiquated Duties and Delivering Equitable American Levies (BAD DEAL) Act of 2026
S 5380
A bill to provide for a ten-year statute of limitations for export control violations under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018.
S 5381
ADVERSARIES Act
S 5294
Keeping China Off the Rails Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.