Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill would eliminate old import taxes and replace them with new American trade fees.
The problem
Current U.S. trade laws contain outdated tariff rules that may not reflect modern commerce needs or provide fair competition for American businesses.
The proposal
The bill removes old tariff duties and introduces new levies on imports to U.S. markets, restructuring how America charges fees on foreign goods.
The impact
American businesses, consumers, foreign trading partners, and workers in manufacturing and retail sectors would face changes in import costs and trade relationships.
Replaces outdated tariff systems with current policies that may better reflect today's global economy. This could help American businesses compete with modern international trade standards.
New import levies could generate government revenue. This money could fund domestic programs or reduce other taxes.
New tariffs might protect domestic producers from foreign competition. This could help American factories and workers in manufacturing sectors.
Higher import costs could make American-made goods more competitive. Consumers might choose domestic products, boosting local manufacturing jobs.
New tariffs typically increase import costs, which get passed to shoppers. American families could pay more for everyday goods and groceries.
Other countries often respond to U.S. tariffs with their own taxes on American exports. This could harm U.S. farmers, manufacturers, and businesses selling abroad.
Companies need clear, stable rules to plan ahead. Changing tariff systems creates confusion and makes long-term business decisions harder.
The bill has no official summary yet. Without knowing specifics, it's hard to predict real impacts on different industries and workers.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5381
ADVERSARIES Act
S 5380
A bill to provide for a ten-year statute of limitations for export control violations under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018.
S 2677
A bill to expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.
S 5294
Keeping China Off the Rails Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.