Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Extends the time limit for prosecuting export control violations from 5 years to 10 years.
The problem
Current law allows only 5 years to prosecute companies breaking export control rules. Authorities say this is too short to catch complex, hidden violations involving sensitive technology or national security concerns.
The proposal
Changes the statute of limitations for Export Control Reform Act violations from 5 years to 10 years, giving prosecutors twice as long to investigate and charge violations.
The impact
Companies involved in exporting goods and technologies face longer exposure to prosecution. Government agencies get more time to pursue violations. Foreign entities and criminal networks may face stricter enforcement.
Longer investigation windows allow authorities to catch sophisticated smuggling schemes and technology theft that may take years to uncover. This protects sensitive military and dual-use technology from reaching adversaries.
Export violations often involve multiple companies, countries, and hidden transactions. Ten years gives investigators time to trace complicated schemes and build stronger cases.
Longer punishment exposure discourages companies from breaking export rules. Violators cannot simply wait out a 5-year statute of limitations to escape consequences.
Some violations take years to detect through audits or intelligence reports. A longer window ensures violators cannot escape prosecution simply because discovery was delayed.
Companies must maintain records and legal protections for twice as long, raising operational costs. Small exporters may struggle more than large corporations to absorb these expenses.
Businesses face prosecution risks for a decade instead of five years, creating longer periods of potential liability. This may discourage legitimate export businesses and international trade.
Older violations become prosecutable long after they occur, when evidence fades and people may have left the company. This creates challenges defending against decades-old allegations.
Extended prosecution windows may discourage companies from engaging in international commerce altogether, fearing future violations they cannot predict or defend against.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10175
Banning Antiquated Duties and Delivering Equitable American Levies (BAD DEAL) Act of 2026
S 5381
ADVERSARIES Act
S 2677
A bill to expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.
S 5294
Keeping China Off the Rails Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.