Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Protects health and location data from unauthorized collection and sharing by companies.
The problem
Companies collect sensitive health and location information about Americans without clear consent or protection, raising privacy and security concerns.
The proposal
Bill establishes rules limiting how companies can gather, use, and sell health and location data without explicit user permission.
The impact
Consumers gain privacy protections; tech and data companies face new compliance requirements; healthcare and location service providers must change practices.
Americans gain control over sensitive health and location information. Companies would need clear permission before collecting or sharing this data. People could better protect their personal information.
Health data sold to third parties could be used for discrimination in hiring or insurance. Location tracking enables stalking or harassment. Restrictions reduce these harms.
Clear rules about data use build confidence in digital services. People feel safer using health apps and location features when rules are transparent and enforceable.
Companies competing on legitimate services rather than data harvesting creates fairer competition. Privacy protections level the playing field for smaller businesses.
Companies must build new systems to track consent and limit data use. Small tech startups face higher expenses than large corporations. These costs could be passed to consumers.
Some free apps and services rely on selling data. Restrictions could eliminate free options or reduce useful features. Users might lose convenient services.
Data restrictions could limit development of health tracking and location-based services. Medical researchers needing population data might face obstacles. New innovations could take longer.
Monitoring compliance across thousands of companies is difficult and expensive. International companies might ignore rules. Regulators may struggle to enforce standards fairly.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.