Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Regulates how states issue professional licenses to prevent improper or unnecessary licensing requirements.
The problem
States may issue overly strict professional licenses that limit job opportunities and increase costs for workers without clear public safety benefits.
The proposal
Establishes standards for state professional licensing practices to ensure requirements are reasonable, necessary, and based on actual public safety needs.
The impact
Workers in licensed professions, state governments, and consumers may experience changes in licensing requirements, job access, and service costs.
Workers can move between states more easily without repeating unnecessary licensing requirements. This helps people find jobs in different states and increases worker opportunities.
Removes unnecessary licensing fees and training requirements that workers must pay for. Workers save money and can enter their professions faster.
Fewer licensing restrictions mean more people can enter professions and start careers. This helps address labor shortages in certain fields.
More workers can enter licensed fields, potentially increasing competition and giving consumers more service options at different price points.
Reducing licensing requirements could allow inadequately trained people to work in sensitive fields like healthcare or construction. This might harm public safety if standards drop too much.
The federal government restricting state licensing decisions could reduce states' power to protect their own residents. States know their local needs better than federal government.
Weakening licensing may undermine quality standards developed by professional communities. Established professionals may have to compete with less-trained workers.
States would need to change existing licensing systems, which costs time and money. Confusion may arise during transitions between old and new standards.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.