Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to help U.S. exporters compete against Chinese subsidized products.
The problem
China allegedly provides unfair financial support to its companies, making American exports less competitive in global markets and harming U.S. businesses.
The proposal
Bill would authorize measures to respond to Chinese subsidies and strengthen competitiveness of American exporters through trade policy tools.
The impact
U.S. exporters, manufacturers, and trade-dependent workers could benefit. Chinese companies and American consumers purchasing imported goods may face higher costs.
By addressing unfair Chinese subsidies, American companies can compete on a more level playing field. This could help U.S. exporters win contracts and grow their businesses. Jobs in manufacturing and export sectors could improve.
American workers in export industries could benefit from stronger competition policies. Fewer cheap subsidized imports means more demand for domestically-made products. Manufacturing jobs could be preserved or created.
The bill targets specific Chinese government subsidies that many experts say violate fair trade principles. Taking action on these practices follows international trade law frameworks.
Clear rules against unfair subsidies could encourage more equitable global trade. This may improve long-term trade relationships with multiple countries.
If tariffs or trade barriers increase, American consumers may pay more for imported goods and Chinese products. Everyday items could become more expensive for families on tight budgets.
China might retaliate with its own tariffs on American goods. This could hurt U.S. companies that export to China and damage economic relationships between the countries.
The bill summary provided does not explain exact proposals or methods. Without clear details, it is hard to predict real-world effects or costs.
Small American companies that import materials from China or rely on Chinese supply chains may face higher costs. They have less ability to absorb price increases than large corporations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10175
Banning Antiquated Duties and Delivering Equitable American Levies (BAD DEAL) Act of 2026
S 5381
ADVERSARIES Act
S 2677
A bill to expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.
S 5380
A bill to provide for a ten-year statute of limitations for export control violations under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.