Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Protects seniors from scams and harmful interactions with artificial intelligence chatbots.
The problem
Seniors may be vulnerable to deceptive chatbots that trick them into financial fraud, sharing personal information, or believing false health claims.
The proposal
The bill would require chatbots to disclose they are AI, prevent seniors from being targeted with scams, and establish consumer protections.
The impact
Senior citizens would gain protections from AI fraud. Tech companies would face new compliance requirements. Chatbot developers would need stricter safeguards.
Seniors are at higher risk of falling for scams and fraud schemes. Clear AI disclosure helps them understand they are not talking to humans. This protection reduces financial losses and harm.
Transparency about AI use builds confidence in technology. People can make informed choices about using chatbots. Trust in digital systems increases when companies are honest.
Establishes clear rules that apply equally to all AI companies. Standard requirements reduce a race-to-the-bottom where companies cut corners. Consistent rules protect consumers nationwide.
Scams targeting seniors through chatbots are growing. This bill directly addresses a documented threat. Proactive regulation prevents future harms.
Chatbot companies must invest in new safeguards and monitoring systems. Smaller tech companies may struggle with expenses. Compliance costs could reduce innovation and increase product prices.
Without detailed definitions, companies may interpret requirements differently. Unclear rules can lead to lawsuits and confusion. Inconsistent enforcement becomes difficult.
Strict regulations could discourage companies from offering chatbots to seniors. Seniors might lose access to helpful AI tools due to liability concerns. Overregulation can backfire.
Bill targets only chatbots but scams use many methods. Seniors face threats through phone calls, emails, and websites too. This bill does not address the full problem.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.