Latest action: Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Senate Majority Leader schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Establishes safety standards for AI-powered toys to protect children.
The problem
AI toys collect data and may pose risks to children. Current rules don't address artificial intelligence features in toys. Parents lack information about AI safety in products.
The proposal
Creates new safety requirements and testing standards for toys using artificial intelligence. Requires manufacturers to disclose how AI toys collect and use child data.
The impact
Toy makers must follow new rules. Children get safer AI toys. Parents get clearer information. Toy prices may increase slightly.
Companies must disclose what data AI toys collect from children. Parents can make informed choices about purchases. Limits how companies use children's personal information.
New testing standards catch dangerous AI features before toys reach stores. Reduces risks from hacking or improper AI functions. Creates uniform safety rules across the industry.
All toy makers follow the same rules, preventing unfair competition. Companies following high standards already won't face disadvantages. Creates clear expectations for the industry.
Protects kids from potentially harmful AI interactions or content. Establishes age-appropriate AI behavior standards. Reduces exposure to manipulation by AI systems.
Testing and compliance costs get passed to consumers. Small toy companies may struggle with expenses. Families with limited budgets face higher costs.
Complex regulations may discourage companies from developing new AI toys. Lengthy approval processes could delay product launches. Smaller startups may exit the market.
Toy companies need new departments to handle regulations. Small manufacturers may find compliance expensive and difficult. Administrative costs drain resources from product development.
Without official bill text, the exact safety standards are unknown. Companies won't know precise compliance expectations. Rules may be interpreted differently by regulators.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.