Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes rights and protections for individuals and businesses selling products online.
The problem
Online sellers face unclear rules, platform policies they cannot control, and limited recourse when accounts are suspended or removed without explanation.
The proposal
Creates formal protections requiring online marketplaces to provide notice, explanations, and appeal processes before suspending seller accounts or removing listings.
The impact
Online sellers gain due process rights. Large platforms must change account management practices. Consumers may see more seller stability and potentially lower prices.
Online sellers would receive clear notice before account suspension and have a chance to fix problems or appeal decisions. This prevents sudden loss of income from unexplained account closures.
Requiring platforms to explain policy violations and give sellers time to respond creates more fairness. Sellers can understand rules and correct mistakes.
Many small business owners rely on online platforms as their main sales channel. Better protections help them keep their businesses stable and growing.
More stable sellers mean consistent product availability and potentially better service. Sellers with secure accounts can invest in quality and customer service.
Large online marketplaces must hire staff to handle appeals and provide documentation. These costs may be passed to all sellers through higher fees or lower payouts.
Required notice and appeal processes could slow removal of sellers engaged in fraud, counterfeits, or dangerous products. Consumers could be harmed during lengthy dispute periods.
Companies must create new systems to track and document all suspensions. This creates paperwork and administrative work that adds little value for honest sellers.
Different types of platforms and problems may need different solutions. Strict rules might not work well for all situations or marketplace types.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.