Latest action: Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 536.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Alex Padilla (D-CA)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill to prevent members of Congress from trading stocks based on insider information.
The problem
Lawmakers may trade stocks using private information learned from their government jobs. This creates unfair advantages and raises concerns about conflicts of interest.
The proposal
The bill would restrict or ban Congressional trading of individual stocks and require adherence to insider trading laws that apply to the general public.
The impact
Members of Congress would face new restrictions on stock trading. Citizens concerned about government corruption would see stricter rules. Investment firms may adjust services for Congressional accounts.
Limiting Congressional stock trading could restore public trust in government. Citizens may feel lawmakers focus on policy instead of personal profits. Clearer rules prevent appearance of improper insider trading.
Regular Americans cannot trade on government secrets they learn at work. Applying the same rules to Congress makes the system fairer. Everyone faces equal rules about insider trading.
Fewer trading opportunities might help lawmakers focus on legislative work. Restrictions could reduce distraction from their government duties.
Bill reinforces existing federal insider trading protections for all. Applying rules equally improves overall market fairness and confidence.
Congressional members may argue they deserve same investment freedoms as other Americans. Restricting stock trading affects their personal finances. Lawmakers may oppose reducing their investment options.
Determining what counts as 'insider information' is complex and hard to enforce. Lawmakers could face legal disputes over which trades are allowed. Monitoring compliance requires new resources and staff.
Lawmakers could shift to mutual funds, bonds, or other investments instead of individual stocks. The intended benefit might be reduced if alternative options exist. Loopholes could allow similar concerns through different investments.
Proving illegal trading versus permitted trading is legally complex. Different trading rules for Congress versus the public could create confusion. Enforcement agencies may struggle with resources.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.