Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires tracking and reporting of plastic waste through supply chains.
The problem
Plastic pollution harms environments and oceans. There is no consistent way to track where plastic goes after use.
The proposal
Establishes a system requiring businesses to track plastic products from manufacture through disposal and report data to a central registry.
The impact
Manufacturers, retailers, waste companies, and consumers face new tracking requirements. Government gains data on plastic flows.
A tracking system would give the government and public real information about where plastic goes. This data could help identify the biggest pollution sources and target solutions more effectively.
Companies tracked and reported may reduce plastic use to lower costs and improve their public image. This could drive innovation in plastic alternatives and packaging.
Better tracking helps create more efficient recycling systems by showing what materials are available and where. This could increase recycling rates and reduce landfill waste.
Transparent data helps consumers understand the plastic problem and make informed purchasing choices, potentially shifting market demand toward less plastic.
Small and large companies must invest in new tracking systems, technology, and staff training. These costs may be passed to consumers through higher prices.
Businesses must learn and follow new rules, file reports, and maintain records. Penalties for mistakes could be severe, creating uncertainty and legal risks.
Collecting detailed supply chain data could reveal business secrets or competitive information. Storing this data creates privacy and cybersecurity risks.
Tracking alone does not ban plastic or require alternatives. Without rules limiting plastic use, tracking may only document the problem without solving it.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.