Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to provide government support and investment for American shipbuilding industry.
The problem
U.S. shipyards face competition and declining capacity. The nation needs stronger domestic maritime manufacturing to support defense and commerce needs.
The proposal
Provides financial incentives, tax benefits, or direct investment to American shipyards to increase production capacity and competitiveness in shipbuilding.
The impact
Shipyard workers, defense contractors, and maritime industry benefit. Taxpayers fund the program. U.S. shipping and defense capabilities affected.
Investing in shipyards ensures the U.S. can build military vessels domestically. This reduces reliance on other countries and supports naval readiness. A strong domestic maritime base is critical for national security.
Shipbuilding creates skilled, well-compensated positions for workers in manufacturing, engineering, and construction. These jobs support families and local communities. Shipyard jobs typically offer benefits and stable employment.
Supporting shipyards helps keep manufacturing in the U.S. instead of overseas. This strengthens the domestic industrial base and reduces trade imbalances. American companies become more competitive globally.
A healthy shipyard industry ensures America can produce vessels needed for commerce and defense without depending on foreign builders. This increases economic resilience during global disruptions.
The bill requires taxpayer funding, increasing federal spending and potentially adding to national debt. This money could be used for other priorities like healthcare or education. Long-term fiscal impact depends on program costs.
Government-funded industries sometimes become inefficient or dependent on subsidies. Shipyards may not improve productivity if they rely on guaranteed government support. Market competition might drive better results.
If shipyard support raises production costs, prices for new ships or shipping services could increase. This affects consumers, businesses, and industries that rely on maritime transport.
Benefits concentrate in shipyard regions while costs spread nationally through taxes. Workers in other industries or regions may see no direct benefit from this targeted investment.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.