Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reduces costs for American farmers through trade policy changes.
The problem
American farmers face high input costs for seeds, fertilizer, and equipment. Foreign trade policies and tariffs increase these costs, making farming less profitable.
The proposal
The bill likely adjusts tariffs or trade agreements to lower prices on farm supplies. It may reduce import taxes on agricultural inputs from other countries.
The impact
Farmers would pay less for supplies, keeping more profit. Food prices could drop. Other industries and workers might be affected by trade changes.
Farmers would spend less money on seeds, fertilizer, and equipment. This helps small and large farms stay profitable and competitive.
Lower farming costs could lead to lower food prices at stores. Families would spend less on groceries and meals.
Farming is stronger when costs are lower. This supports rural communities and farming jobs across the country.
American farmers can compete better with international farmers when their costs are lower. This helps U.S. agriculture grow.
Lower tariffs on imports could hurt American manufacturers of farm equipment and supplies. Domestic companies might lose business or jobs.
Changing trade rules might anger other countries. They could respond with their own tariffs, hurting other American exports and workers.
Without seeing the full bill, it's hard to know exactly what trades will change. Some unintended consequences could happen.
Lower tariffs mean the government collects less money from import taxes. This money would need to come from other sources.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10175
Banning Antiquated Duties and Delivering Equitable American Levies (BAD DEAL) Act of 2026
S 5381
ADVERSARIES Act
S 2677
A bill to expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.
S 5380
A bill to provide for a ten-year statute of limitations for export control violations under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.