Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allows federal legalization and regulation of cannabis nationwide.
The problem
Cannabis remains federally illegal despite many states allowing it, creating confusion between state and federal law and preventing banking and research.
The proposal
Removes cannabis from federal drug schedules, establishes federal regulations, allows interstate commerce, and expunges certain cannabis convictions.
The impact
Affects cannabis users, businesses, states, federal enforcement, banking institutions, and those with prior convictions.
Eliminates conflict between state and federal law. Lets states set their own rules while allowing federal oversight. Reduces confusion for businesses and consumers.
Cannabis businesses can use banks and financial services. Currently most operate in cash due to federal prohibition. This improves safety and allows normal business operations.
Clears certain cannabis-related convictions. Allows people to move forward without criminal records. Reduces barriers to employment and housing.
Enables scientists to study cannabis effects on health. Currently restricted by federal prohibition. Could improve medical understanding and patient care.
Increased cannabis use could harm youth brain development and impair driving. Legalization typically increases availability and use rates. Long-term health effects still being studied.
No federal quality or safety standards established in basic legislation. Regulation details matter greatly. Could lead to inconsistent product safety across states.
Unclear how employers test for impairment or set workplace policies. Unlike alcohol, no reliable roadside impairment test exists. May create workplace safety challenges.
Revenue depends on implementation details not in summary. Black market competition could limit tax collection. States have varied experiences with tax collection.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.