Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to regulate conversational AI services and establish government oversight rules.
The problem
Conversational AI systems like chatbots are growing rapidly with unclear rules about safety, accuracy, and accountability. Users and businesses lack clear guidance on how these systems should work.
The proposal
The bill would establish regulatory requirements for conversational AI services, likely including transparency standards, safety measures, and oversight mechanisms for providers.
The impact
AI companies, users of AI services, tech industry, and consumers would need to follow new rules about how conversational AI operates and is monitored.
Clear rules protect people from harmful or misleading AI systems. Users would know AI responses follow safety standards. Companies would be held accountable for problems.
Businesses would know what rules apply, making it easier to plan and invest. Unclear regulations now make companies uncertain about compliance requirements.
Requirements could prevent bad actors from misusing AI for fraud or misinformation. Oversight helps catch problems early before widespread harm occurs.
Regulations level the playing field so established companies and startups follow same rules. This prevents bad actors from gaining unfair advantages.
Heavy regulations might discourage new AI development and startups from entering the market. Companies may spend more resources on compliance than innovation.
New rules could be expensive for companies to implement, especially small businesses. These costs might get passed to consumers in higher prices.
AI technology moves fast but laws change slowly. Rules written today might become outdated quickly or lag behind actual problems.
New oversight requirements need staff and resources to enforce. This creates government spending and bureaucratic processes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.