Latest action: Held at the desk.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Joni Ernst (R-IA)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Studies feasibility of domestic manufacturing for critical infrastructure equipment.
The problem
The U.S. may depend too much on foreign suppliers for equipment needed to run critical infrastructure like power grids and water systems.
The proposal
The bill directs officials to study whether America can manufacture critical infrastructure equipment domestically and report findings to Congress.
The impact
Manufacturers, government agencies, and supply chain companies would be involved in feasibility studies. Results could influence future infrastructure policy.
Reducing reliance on foreign suppliers for critical infrastructure equipment protects the nation from supply disruptions during crises or conflicts. Domestic manufacturing capacity ensures essential services remain operational.
Building domestic manufacturing capacity for critical infrastructure could create manufacturing and engineering jobs. This supports economic growth in industrial sectors.
A feasibility study provides factual information about costs, timeline, and challenges. Congress can make better infrastructure policy decisions based on real data.
Domestic production may reduce transportation costs and supply chain vulnerabilities. Lower long-term expenses could benefit infrastructure maintenance budgets.
Building domestic manufacturing facilities requires significant government or private investment. These costs may be high relative to current cheaper foreign imports.
Domestic manufacturing typically costs more than overseas production. Infrastructure operators and taxpayers could face higher costs for equipment and services.
A feasibility study only examines possibilities but doesn't guarantee action. Results may show manufacturing is too expensive or difficult, wasting time and resources.
Reducing reliance on foreign suppliers could create diplomatic friction with trading partners. Other countries might retaliate with their own trade restrictions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.