Latest action: Held at the desk.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Timothy Kaine (D-VA)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
This bill ends the national emergency that allowed tariffs on Brazilian imports.
The problem
The President declared a national emergency to impose duties on imports from Brazil. This resolution seeks to terminate that emergency declaration and the associated tariffs.
The proposal
The bill terminates the national emergency previously declared to impose duties on articles imported from Brazil, ending the authority for those tariffs.
The impact
Importers, Brazilian exporters, U.S. consumers, and businesses using Brazilian goods would be affected by removing tariffs on Brazilian products.
Removing tariffs on Brazilian imports could reduce costs for American consumers on affected goods. Products like coffee, steel, and agricultural items may become cheaper. This increases purchasing power for households.
Ending the emergency declaration reduces tensions in U.S.-Brazil trade relations. This could improve diplomatic relationships and avoid potential retaliatory tariffs from Brazil. Smoother trade relations benefit both economies.
Companies importing from Brazil face unpredictable tariff policies. Ending the emergency removes this uncertainty and allows businesses to plan more reliably. Stable trade rules help small and large importers operate confidently.
The resolution aligns with free-trade ideology by removing emergency trade barriers. It reflects the view that tariffs should be limited and justified only in genuine national emergencies. This supports open-market policies.
Removing tariffs exposes American producers to more Brazilian competition. U.S. manufacturers of steel, agriculture, and other products may lose market share. Domestic jobs could be affected in these industries.
If tariffs were justified on national security grounds, removing them could weaken that argument. Industries deemed strategically important might become less competitive. Critics may argue this harms domestic capacity.
Tariffs can be tools in trade negotiations. Removing them unilaterally gives up potential bargaining power with Brazil. The U.S. loses leverage for future trade deals or policy concessions.
Lower tariffs typically increase imports, which can expand the trade deficit with Brazil. This could be viewed negatively by those concerned about U.S. trade imbalances. Import growth may outpace export opportunities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10175
Banning Antiquated Duties and Delivering Equitable American Levies (BAD DEAL) Act of 2026
S 5381
ADVERSARIES Act
S 2677
A bill to expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.
S 5380
A bill to provide for a ten-year statute of limitations for export control violations under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.