Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill requiring transparency and predictability rules for federal small business assistance programs.
The problem
Small businesses struggle to understand varying federal assistance programs with inconsistent rules, making it hard to access help and plan their operations effectively.
The proposal
The bill would establish consistent transparency standards and predictable rules for federal small business opportunity programs to help owners navigate assistance options.
The impact
Small business owners gain clearer information about federal programs. Federal agencies must standardize their processes. Compliance costs may increase for government.
Small business owners will have clearer, more consistent information about available federal assistance programs. This reduces confusion and helps businesses find relevant opportunities faster. Clear rules help owners plan better.
Standardized rules mean small businesses are treated similarly regardless of which federal agency helps them. Predictable standards prevent arbitrary decisions. This creates a more level playing field.
When rules are predictable and transparent, business owners can make better long-term plans. Consistent programs reduce uncertainty. Businesses can confidently pursue opportunities and grow.
Standardized processes reduce duplication across agencies. Clearer requirements lower application rejection rates due to confusion. Resources go toward actual assistance instead of fixing mistakes.
Federal agencies must rewrite rules, train staff, and update systems to comply. This creates one-time and ongoing expenses. Taxpayers may bear these costs.
Standardized rules may prevent agencies from adjusting programs to local needs or special situations. One-size-fits-all approaches might work poorly in different regions or industries.
Changing established agency processes can create confusion during changeover. Some businesses may struggle with new requirements. Implementation may take years to complete fully.
Standardized requirements might unintentionally exclude some small businesses that don't fit standard categories. Regulations could become overly detailed and harder for very small operators.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.