Latest action: Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 64.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Russ Fulcher (R-ID)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Requires companies to inform consumers about smart device data collection and usage practices.
The problem
Smart devices collect personal data from users, but consumers often don't understand what information is gathered or how companies use it.
The proposal
The bill mandates that manufacturers provide clear, accessible information about smart devices' data collection, storage, and sharing practices to consumers.
The impact
Consumers gain transparency about their smart devices. Manufacturers must create new disclosure documents. Regulators may enforce compliance requirements.
Consumers will know what data their smart devices collect and how companies use it. This helps people make informed buying decisions and protect their privacy.
Clear information about data practices helps consumers understand privacy risks. People can take steps to protect themselves or avoid risky devices.
Companies with better privacy practices can highlight this advantage. Transparency helps consumers choose based on privacy standards, creating healthy competition.
Disclosure requirements discourage companies from hiding problematic data practices. This creates accountability and builds consumer trust in smart device markets.
Manufacturers must invest in creating clear disclosure documents and updating systems. These costs may increase product prices or reduce company profits.
The bill contains no official summary or details about what disclosure format is required. Companies may struggle to understand exact compliance standards.
Even with disclosures, many consumers may not read or understand technical information about data practices. The requirements may not improve awareness as intended.
Enforcement agencies must develop rules interpreting vague bill language. This creates uncertainty and potential disputes between regulators and companies.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.