Latest action: Received in the Senate.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Greg Landsman (D-OH)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill aims to strengthen U.S. semiconductor supply chains and reduce dependence on foreign chip manufacturers.
The problem
The U.S. relies heavily on foreign countries for computer chips, creating national security and economic vulnerabilities when supply chains are disrupted.
The proposal
Establishes policies to support domestic semiconductor manufacturing, research, and supply chain resilience through coordination and potentially financial incentives.
The impact
Semiconductor companies, manufacturers, tech industry workers, and consumers may experience changes in chip availability, costs, and American tech competitiveness.
Reducing dependence on foreign chip suppliers protects critical defense and infrastructure systems from supply disruptions. A domestic semiconductor industry provides resilience during global crises or geopolitical tensions.
Supporting domestic chip manufacturing generates high-paying manufacturing and engineering jobs. Building new semiconductor facilities boosts local economies and increases American competitiveness.
Domestically-produced chips reduce delays and shortages that harm American businesses and consumers. Stable supply chains help keep technology affordable and available.
Investing in domestic research and development keeps advanced technology innovation within the U.S. This maintains American leadership in semiconductor technology.
Supporting domestic semiconductor manufacturing is expensive and may require substantial taxpayer funding. Government subsidies could increase the national debt or reduce funding for other programs.
Domestic manufacturing is typically more expensive than overseas production, potentially raising prices for chips and electronic devices. Consumers could pay more for computers and phones.
Building new semiconductor factories and capabilities takes many years to complete. The benefits won't be immediate, while costs begin right away.
Other countries might view protectionist semiconductor policies as unfair and respond with their own trade restrictions. International trade disputes could harm American businesses.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.