Latest action: Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 62.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
John James (R-MI)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill aims to strengthen U.S. supply chains and reduce dependence on foreign suppliers for critical goods.
The problem
The U.S. relies heavily on other countries for essential materials and products. Supply chain disruptions from overseas threaten American businesses, jobs, and national security interests.
The proposal
The bill establishes programs to support domestic production of critical goods, invests in supply chain infrastructure, and encourages companies to source materials from allies instead of other nations.
The impact
Manufacturers, workers, and consumers may see higher costs initially. Domestic producers of critical goods could gain business advantages and job opportunities.
Strengthening domestic supply chains makes America less vulnerable to disruptions from other countries. This protects jobs and economic stability when international problems occur.
Investing in domestic production and infrastructure creates manufacturing and construction jobs in America. Workers benefit from new employment opportunities in their communities.
Producing critical materials domestically ensures the military and essential services have reliable access to needed supplies. This reduces risks during international conflicts or emergencies.
Encouraging trade with friendly countries instead of adversaries builds stronger partnerships. This creates mutual economic benefits with trustworthy trading partners.
Domestic production often costs more than buying from cheaper overseas sources. Consumers and businesses could face higher prices for products and materials.
The bill likely requires significant taxpayer funding for programs and infrastructure. Critics argue this money could be used for other priorities.
Reducing purchases from certain countries could upset trading partners and lead to disputes. Other nations might retaliate with their own trade restrictions.
Without the full bill text, it is unclear if proposed programs will actually strengthen supply chains. Results depend on careful implementation and business cooperation.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.