Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Improves water security and reliability for the Sacramento River Basin region.
The problem
The Sacramento River Basin faces water management challenges affecting agriculture, communities, and ecosystems. Current water systems may not reliably meet demands.
The proposal
Authorizes new water management projects and infrastructure improvements in the Sacramento River Basin to enhance water supply reliability and security.
The impact
Affects farmers, cities, and communities in California's Sacramento region. Changes water availability, management practices, and infrastructure investment.
New infrastructure could provide more reliable water for agriculture and communities during dry periods. This helps protect farms and cities from water shortages.
More dependable water supply supports farming operations and rural economies. Reduces crop losses from drought conditions.
Improved water security can support population growth and economic development in the Sacramento region.
Basin-focused approach allows regional water management tailored to local needs rather than statewide one-size-fits-all solutions.
New water projects may impact rivers, fish, and wildlife habitats. Could affect endangered species or natural ecosystems in the basin.
Water infrastructure projects are expensive. Taxpayers may fund significant costs through federal spending.
Water management changes in Sacramento Basin could affect water availability for other California regions, creating regional disputes.
Without official summary, specific project details and potential impacts are unclear. Hard to fully assess consequences.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7250
To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.
HR 10602
Ottawa County Environmental Infrastructure Act
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 2753
Urban Canal Modernization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.