Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to reduce lead in toys and children's products.
The problem
Lead in toys can harm children's health and development. Current regulations may not adequately protect children from lead exposure.
The proposal
Establishes stricter limits on lead content in toys and children's products. Sets testing and certification requirements for manufacturers.
The impact
Toy manufacturers must comply with new standards. Parents and children benefit from safer products. Some companies face increased production costs.
Reducing lead exposure prevents serious health problems like brain damage, learning disabilities, and behavioral issues in children. Lead is especially dangerous for young children whose brains are still developing.
Uniform national standards make it easier for manufacturers to comply and consumers to understand product safety. Clear rules reduce confusion about which products are safe.
Companies already making safe products aren't undercut by competitors using cheaper, dangerous materials. Creates fair competition based on safety.
Preventing lead poisoning reduces medical treatment expenses and disability costs. Healthier children means lower long-term healthcare spending.
Manufacturers must redesign products and implement new testing procedures. These expenses could increase toy prices for consumers.
Small toy makers may struggle to afford new testing equipment and certification processes. Some small companies might leave the market.
Without seeing the actual bill text, we don't know the specific lead limits, testing methods, or enforcement procedures. The rules could be too strict or too loose.
If rules differ from other countries, imports may face delays. International manufacturers might need separate production lines for U.S. products.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.