Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires economic review of tariff changes before the government implements them.
The problem
Tariffs can affect the economy significantly. Currently, the government may change tariffs without advance economic analysis of their effects on prices, jobs, and trade.
The proposal
The bill requires the Congressional Budget Office to study and report the economic impact of any proposed tariff changes before they become official policy.
The impact
Businesses, workers, consumers, and policymakers would see economic analysis before tariff decisions are made, potentially affecting prices, employment, and international trade.
Policymakers would have solid economic data before changing tariffs. This could lead to smarter decisions that avoid unintended harm to the economy.
The public and Congress would know the expected effects before tariffs change. This makes government more accountable and honest about trade policy choices.
Businesses could better plan ahead if they knew economic impacts before tariff changes happen. This reduces sudden shocks to markets and jobs.
An independent agency would study effects neutrally. This avoids political bias that might hide true economic costs or benefits.
Required reviews take time. This could delay important trade policy decisions when the government needs to act quickly to respond to threats.
Conducting detailed economic reviews costs money. This means taxpayer funds spent on analysis instead of other priorities.
Required reviews might prevent the government from making emergency tariff decisions in crisis situations where speed matters more than analysis.
Economic forecasts are sometimes wrong. Reviews might give false confidence in predictions that miss actual real-world outcomes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10175
Banning Antiquated Duties and Delivering Equitable American Levies (BAD DEAL) Act of 2026
S 5381
ADVERSARIES Act
S 2677
A bill to expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.
S 5380
A bill to provide for a ten-year statute of limitations for export control violations under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.