Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill addresses water resources development through the TAAP Act framework.
The problem
Water infrastructure and management challenges require coordinated federal policy updates for resource development and environmental stewardship.
The proposal
Establishes or modifies water resources development programs, potentially affecting federal water management, infrastructure funding, and environmental regulations.
The impact
Affects water utility agencies, states, farmers, environmental groups, and communities dependent on federal water policy and infrastructure funding decisions.
May authorize funding for water systems, dams, reservoirs, or irrigation projects. Could improve water supply reliability and agricultural productivity. Supports infrastructure modernization.
Coordinated federal water resources policy can help states manage droughts and water shortages. May improve disaster preparedness and resource planning.
Water infrastructure projects create construction jobs and support agricultural, industrial, and municipal economic activity. Can stimulate local economies.
Establishes clearer framework for federal and state water management partnerships. May reduce conflicts over water resource allocation and usage.
Large water projects can impact ecosystems, wetlands, and wildlife habitats. May affect fish populations and water quality if not properly regulated.
Water infrastructure projects are expensive and may require significant federal spending. Could strain budgets or require tax increases.
Irrigation-focused policies may conflict with environmental protection goals. Could create disputes between farming interests and conservation groups.
Increased federal control of water resources may limit private water utility operations. Could affect private water industry investment and competition.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7250
To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.
HR 10602
Ottawa County Environmental Infrastructure Act
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 2753
Urban Canal Modernization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.