Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Removes the 90/10 rule that limits federal student aid at for-profit schools.
The problem
The 90/10 rule requires proprietary schools to get 10% of revenue from non-federal sources. Some argue this rule restricts these schools' ability to serve students and limits educational options.
The proposal
This bill repeals the 90/10 rule for proprietary schools under federal student aid programs, allowing them to receive more than 90% of revenue from federal sources.
The impact
For-profit school students and operators would face fewer restrictions on federal aid. Taxpayers fund more of for-profit school revenue. Traditional public and nonprofit colleges compete differently.
Removing restrictions could allow more for-profit schools to operate and expand programs. This might increase educational choices for students seeking career training or alternative degree paths.
For-profit schools would face fewer federal restrictions on their business model. This deregulation could reduce compliance costs and administrative overhead.
For-profit schools often focus on job-specific training. Removing the rule might allow faster expansion of vocational and technical programs.
Federal student aid would support more of for-profit school revenue. Taxpayers could spend more money on education with less non-federal accountability or oversight.
The 90/10 rule encouraged schools to maintain private funding and outside accountability. Removing it could weaken incentives for schools to demonstrate educational quality and student outcomes.
For-profit schools historically have higher student loan default rates. Fewer restrictions could increase risky lending to students at schools with poor outcomes, leading to unpayable debt.
Public and nonprofit colleges have stricter accountability rules. For-profit schools with fewer restrictions could compete unfairly while having less financial responsibility.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.