Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 624.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Nydia Velázquez (D-NY)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Protects small businesses by regulating competition practices and market conduct.
The problem
Small businesses face unfair competitive practices from larger companies that may limit their market access and growth opportunities.
The proposal
Establishes rules and enforcement mechanisms to prevent anti-competitive conduct targeting small business competitors.
The impact
Small businesses gain protection; large companies face compliance requirements; consumers may benefit from fairer competition and market diversity.
Small businesses often struggle against larger competitors with more resources. This bill aims to prevent unfair tactics that crush smaller companies. It helps small businesses compete based on quality and service rather than being forced out by predatory practices.
When entrepreneurs know they won't face illegal anti-competitive behavior, more people start new businesses. This can lead to job creation and economic growth in local communities.
Competition improves products and services while lowering prices. Protecting small businesses from unfair tactics keeps more competitors in the market, which benefits shoppers.
Small businesses often drive innovation and create niche products. Protecting them ensures diverse offerings and new ideas reach consumers.
Businesses must follow new rules, which requires hiring lawyers and compliance officers. These costs could burden all companies, especially smaller ones trying to comply.
Without detailed definitions, businesses won't know exactly what's illegal. This uncertainty could lead to lawsuits and confusion about acceptable business practices.
Proving anti-competitive conduct is difficult and expensive. Enforcement agencies may be overwhelmed, making the law ineffective or allowing bad actors to escape consequences.
Competitors might file false complaints to harass each other. The law could be weaponized rather than used to protect legitimate small business interests.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.