Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires labels on AI-generated content to tell people when AI made something.
The problem
People see AI-created images, videos, and text online without knowing it's fake. This confuses audiences and spreads misinformation easily.
The proposal
The bill would require creators to label content made by artificial intelligence so viewers know it's machine-generated, not human-made.
The impact
Tech companies, content creators, and social media users face new labeling requirements. Consumers gain clearer information about AI-made content online.
Human creators get credit for their real work. AI tools cannot unfairly take advantage by hiding their origin.
Companies must be honest about using AI in products and services. This increases public understanding of AI technology.
Clear AI labels help people spot fake videos and images before believing them. This reduces the spread of false information online.
People deserve to know when content is artificially made. Labeling builds trust and lets viewers make informed choices.
Policing millions of posts daily is extremely expensive. Companies need new staff and systems to track and label everything.
Small platforms and creators struggle more than big companies. Rules that help large tech firms may hurt smaller competitors.
The bill lacks clear details on what counts as AI-generated. Different companies might label things differently, confusing users.
Heavy labeling rules might discourage companies from developing new AI tools. Compliance costs could reduce investment in helpful AI.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.