Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to protect children's safety in digital commerce and online transactions.
The problem
Children face risks from unsafe online platforms, predatory practices, and inadequate age verification in digital marketplaces and services.
The proposal
Establishes safety standards, age verification requirements, and protections for minors engaged in online commerce and digital platforms.
The impact
Children, parents, online businesses, and tech companies face new compliance requirements and operational changes for age verification and safety features.
Creates legal requirements for platforms to verify age and prevent children from accessing inappropriate content or services. This reduces exploitation and predatory behavior targeting minors in digital spaces.
Establishes uniform safety rules across the commerce sector instead of inconsistent policies. Gives parents and companies clear guidelines about what's required.
Responds to documented cases of minors being exploited through online transactions and platforms. Provides legal tools to hold companies accountable for negligence.
May increase parent confidence in online shopping and digital services by ensuring age-appropriate safeguards. Could expand legitimate e-commerce use among families.
Companies must invest in age verification technology and safety systems. Smaller online businesses may struggle with expense, potentially reducing market competition.
Age verification often requires collecting personal data from users. Raises questions about who stores this information and how it's protected.
Age verification systems are imperfect and can block legitimate users or be bypassed. May create false sense of security without fully solving the problem.
Bill details are unavailable, making it hard to assess what specific requirements companies must follow. Vague rules could lead to inconsistent application.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.