Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to limit U.S. investment in countries considered regional adversaries.
The problem
The U.S. government wants to prevent American money from funding countries it views as regional threats or adversaries.
The proposal
The bill would create restrictions on U.S. investments, trade, or financial activities with designated regional adversary nations.
The impact
American investors, companies doing international business, and people in affected countries would face new investment limits and financial restrictions.
Prevents American capital from strengthening potential adversaries' economies or militaries. Keeps U.S. investment power from supporting countries that may threaten American interests.
Aligns investment rules with U.S. foreign policy goals. Creates clear rules about which countries Americans can invest in based on diplomatic relationships.
May decrease economic ties that could complicate military or diplomatic conflicts. Limits financial interdependence with potential rivals.
American companies lose profitable investment opportunities in restricted countries. Smaller businesses may struggle more with these limitations than large corporations.
Other countries might restrict their own investments in America in response. Could trigger trade conflicts that harm American workers and businesses.
Deciding which countries are 'regional adversaries' is subjective and political. Definitions could change with different administrations, creating business uncertainty.
Restrictions might reduce competition and increase prices for American consumers. Could limit access to affordable goods and services.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10175
Banning Antiquated Duties and Delivering Equitable American Levies (BAD DEAL) Act of 2026
S 5381
ADVERSARIES Act
S 2677
A bill to expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.
S 5380
A bill to provide for a ten-year statute of limitations for export control violations under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.