Latest action: Became Public Law No: 119-34.
Signed into law by the President (or passed over a veto). Now public law.
The President signed the bill into law (or Congress overrode a veto). It's now public law and federal agencies will implement it.
Increases transparency in how the U.S. government controls exports of sensitive technologies and goods.
The problem
Current export control processes lack sufficient transparency, making it difficult for businesses and Congress to understand decision-making and evaluate policy effectiveness.
The proposal
Requires federal agencies to improve reporting and disclosure of export control decisions, reviews, and data to increase public and congressional oversight.
The impact
Businesses involved in exports, government agencies, Congress, and foreign trading partners experience changes in how export decisions are communicated and documented.
Congress gains clearer information about export control decisions and their rationale. This allows lawmakers to evaluate whether policies are working as intended and make informed decisions about trade regulations.
Companies understand export control rules more clearly and can better predict approval outcomes. Increased transparency helps businesses plan operations and investments with greater confidence.
Better reporting mechanisms help ensure export control decisions are applied fairly and consistently across similar cases. This reduces allegations of arbitrary or unfair treatment.
Transparent processes allow officials to be held accountable for security decisions. Public scrutiny can help identify problems while protecting genuinely sensitive information through controlled disclosure.
Increased transparency could expose sensitive intelligence methods or national security vulnerabilities if disclosure requirements aren't carefully designed. Adversaries might exploit revealed information about what gets controlled.
Government agencies must develop new reporting systems and dedicate staff to compliance. These costs and delays could slow the export approval process and strain limited resources.
Detailed disclosure of export decisions might reveal competitive information about U.S. companies or technologies to foreign competitors. This could harm American businesses' market position.
Public disclosure of denied exports or detailed control reasons could embarrass ally nations or complicate diplomatic relationships. Some decisions benefit from confidential handling.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10175
Banning Antiquated Duties and Delivering Equitable American Levies (BAD DEAL) Act of 2026
S 5381
ADVERSARIES Act
S 2677
A bill to expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.
S 5380
A bill to provide for a ten-year statute of limitations for export control violations under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.