Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to reduce government regulations and paperwork requirements for small businesses.
The problem
Small businesses report spending significant time and money complying with federal regulations and paperwork, which can slow growth and innovation.
The proposal
The bill would reduce regulatory requirements and paperwork burdens on small businesses, though specific changes are not detailed in available information.
The impact
Small business owners would potentially spend less time on compliance. Federal agencies and regulatory oversight may be affected. Economic effects depend on which rules are reduced.
Reducing paperwork and regulations could make it simpler for small business owners to focus on growing their companies instead of completing forms. This may help entrepreneurs start and expand businesses more quickly. Lower compliance costs could free up money for hiring and investment.
Less regulatory burden might allow small companies to develop new products and services more quickly. Reduced red tape could help innovative startups bring ideas to market without lengthy approval processes. This could increase competition and consumer choices.
Smaller businesses that grow often hire more workers. Reducing compliance costs could allow businesses to invest in employees instead of compliance staff. This may lead to more job opportunities in local communities.
Large corporations have compliance departments; small businesses often struggle with regulations. Reducing red tape narrows this gap and lets small companies compete more fairly. This could help local and independent businesses thrive.
Many regulations protect workers from unsafe conditions, unfair pay, and discrimination. Removing regulations could mean fewer workplace safety rules or wage protections. Workers might face greater risks or unfair treatment without these safeguards.
Environmental regulations protect air, water, and public health from pollution. Reducing these rules could allow more pollution and damage to the environment. Communities might face contaminated water or unhealthy air quality.
Regulations ensure products are safe, food is clean, and services meet standards. Fewer regulations could mean unsafe products reaching consumers. People might be harmed by dangerous goods or services without inspection requirements.
The bill title suggests reducing red tape, but no specific regulations are listed. Without knowing which rules would be removed, it's hard to evaluate real impacts. This lack of detail makes it difficult to assess true costs and benefits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.