Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Authorizes a federal program to help businesses choose safer chemical products.
The problem
Many businesses use chemicals without knowing safer alternatives exist. Companies need federal guidance on choosing less harmful products.
The proposal
Creates the Safer Choice Program to identify and promote safer chemical products and practices for businesses and consumers.
The impact
Businesses, manufacturers, and consumers gain access to information about safer chemicals. Chemical industry may face pressure to reformulate products.
Employees exposed to safer chemicals may experience fewer health problems. Reduces workplace injuries and illnesses from hazardous substances.
Companies get clear guidance on safer chemical options. Reduces confusion about which products are genuinely safer.
Safer chemicals may pollute air, water, and soil less. Lowers long-term environmental cleanup costs.
Families can buy products labeled as safer. Increases transparency about chemical content in household goods.
Companies reformulating products face research and development expenses. Smaller businesses may struggle more than large ones to switch chemicals.
Federal government must hire staff and manage the program. Requires government funding and resources.
Without specifics in bill text, determining what counts as 'safer' is unclear. Ambiguity could lead to inconsistent labeling.
Program may only cover certain industries or products initially. Some hazardous chemicals might remain unregulated.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.