Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
This bill helps communities prepare for and recover from flooding.
The problem
Flooding causes major damage to homes, businesses, and infrastructure in many American communities. Costs are rising as climate patterns change and populations grow.
The proposal
The bill provides federal funding and resources to help communities build better flood defenses, prepare emergency plans, and recover after floods happen.
The impact
Local governments, property owners, and residents in flood-prone areas would get federal support. Taxpayers fund the program. Insurance companies and construction industries may be affected.
Funding for flood prevention reduces damage to homes and businesses. This saves families from losing their property and money.
Better planning and defenses help people evacuate safely and avoid flooding dangers. Communities get warning systems and shelter plans.
Preventing floods is cheaper than cleaning up after them. Federal and state governments spend less on disaster relief.
Communities that prepare for floods keep businesses open and jobs stable. Construction jobs grow during resilience projects.
Federal funding comes from taxes. All Americans pay, even those not in flood zones. Costs could be very large.
Some communities might get more funding than others based on politics or population. Smaller towns could be left behind.
Flood defenses need constant repairs and updates. Government must keep spending money year after year.
If people know floods are protected against, they might build homes in dangerous places. This could increase long-term costs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7250
To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.
HR 10602
Ottawa County Environmental Infrastructure Act
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 2753
Urban Canal Modernization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.